Skip to content

ebpf usecases analysis

Classification of Kernel eBPF Use Cases

  1. Policy Tuning
  2. Event Monitoring and Observability
  3. High-Speed Data Processing
  4. Access Control and Security
  5. Testing and Error Injection
  6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

1. Policy Tuning

Definition: Dynamically adjusting kernel policies to optimize system performance or behavior.

Use Cases:

  • Dynamic CPU Scheduling:
  • Example: Adjusting the scheduler’s behavior based on real-time CPU load using eBPF programs to prioritize critical processes, ensuring responsive performance for key services under high load conditions.
  • Controlling the CPU scheduler with BPF https://lwn.net/Articles/873244/
  • A lot of usecases this year in LPC: Sched-Ext: The BPF extensible scheduler class MC
    • https://lpc.events/event/18/sessions/192/

  • Ghost (SOSP 21) https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3477132.3483542

  • Memory Management Optimization:

  • Example: Modifying the page reclamation strategy during memory pressure. eBPF can influence how the kernel reclaims memory pages, optimizing memory utilization for memory-intensive applications.
  • LPC and a few papers https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1932/

  • https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.11220

  • Dynamic I/O policy:

  • Example: Tuning I/O scheduling policies based on current disk usage patterns. For instance, optimizing read/write operations for database workloads by dynamically adjusting the I/O scheduler using eBPF.

  • eBPF for FUSE: https://lwn.net/Articles/915717/

    • https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1339/attachments/945/1861/LPC2022%20Fuse-bpf.pdf

  • HID Driver

  • https://docs.kernel.org/hid/hid-bpf.html
  • Used y steamdeck

Fuse example

+struct fuse_ops {
+ uint32_t (*open_prefilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ struct fuse_open_in *in);
+ uint32_t (*open_postfilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ const struct fuse_open_in *in,
+ struct fuse_open_out *out);
+
+ uint32_t (*opendir_prefilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ struct fuse_open_in *in);
+ uint32_t (*opendir_postfilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ const struct fuse_open_in *in,
+ struct fuse_open_out *out);
+
+ uint32_t (*create_open_prefilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ struct fuse_create_in *in, struct fuse_buffer *name);
+ uint32_t (*create_open_postfilter)(const struct bpf_fuse_meta_info *meta,
+ const struct fuse_create_in *in, const struct fuse_buffer *name,
+ struct fuse_entry_out *entry_out, struct fuse_open_out *out);

Scheduler

scx_rustland implements the following callbacks in the eBPF component:

/*
 * Scheduling class declaration.
 */
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct sched_ext_ops rustland = {
        .select_cpu             = (void *)rustland_select_cpu,
        .enqueue                = (void *)rustland_enqueue,
        .dispatch               = (void *)rustland_dispatch,
        .running                = (void *)rustland_running,
        .stopping               = (void *)rustland_stopping,
        .update_idle            = (void *)rustland_update_idle,
        .set_cpumask            = (void *)rustland_set_cpumask,
        .cpu_release            = (void *)rustland_cpu_release,
        .init_task              = (void *)rustland_init_task,
        .exit_task              = (void *)rustland_exit_task,
        .init                   = (void *)rustland_init,
        .exit                   = (void *)rustland_exit,
        .flags                  = SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST | SCX_OPS_KEEP_BUILTIN_IDLE,
        .timeout_ms             = 5000,
        .name                   = "rustland",
};
The workflow is the following:

.select_cpu() implements the logic to assign a target CPU to a task that wants to run, typically you have to decide if you want to keep the task on the same CPU or if it needs to be migrated to a different one (for example if the current CPU is busy); if we can find an idle CPU at this stage there’s no reason to call the scheduler, the task can be immediately dispatched here. 

s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(rustland_select_cpu, struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
                   u64 wake_flags)
{
        bool is_idle = false;
        s32 cpu;

        cpu = scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, &is_idle);
        if (is_idle) {
                /*
                 * Using SCX_DSQ_LOCAL ensures that the task will be executed
                 * directly on the CPU returned by this function.
                 */
                dispatch_task(p, SCX_DSQ_LOCAL, 0, 0);
                __sync_fetch_and_add(&nr_kernel_dispatches, 1);
        }

        return cpu;
}
If we can’t find an idle CPU this step will just return the previously used CPU, that can be used as a hint for the user-space scheduler (keeping tasks on the same CPU has multiple benefits, such as reusing hot caches and avoid any kind migration overhead). However this decision is not the final one, the user-space scheduler can decide to move the task to a different CPU if needed.

  • https://arighi.blogspot.com/2024/02/writing-scheduler-for-linux-in-rust.html

Or:

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/*
 * Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
 * Copyright (c) 2024 David Vernet <[email protected]>
 */

#include <scx/common.bpf.h>

char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

#include "hotplug_test.h"

UEI_DEFINE(uei);

void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(hotplug_exit, struct scx_exit_info *ei)
{
    UEI_RECORD(uei, ei);
}

static void exit_from_hotplug(s32 cpu, bool onlining)
{
    /*
     * Ignored, just used to verify that we can invoke blocking kfuncs
     * from the hotplug path.
     */
    scx_bpf_create_dsq(0, -1);

    s64 code = SCX_ECODE_ACT_RESTART | HOTPLUG_EXIT_RSN;

    if (onlining)
        code |= HOTPLUG_ONLINING;

    scx_bpf_exit(code, "hotplug event detected (%d going %s)", cpu,
             onlining ? "online" : "offline");
}

void BPF_STRUCT_OPS_SLEEPABLE(hotplug_cpu_online, s32 cpu)
{
    exit_from_hotplug(cpu, true);
}

void BPF_STRUCT_OPS_SLEEPABLE(hotplug_cpu_offline, s32 cpu)
{
    exit_from_hotplug(cpu, false);
}

SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct sched_ext_ops hotplug_cb_ops = {
    .cpu_online     = hotplug_cpu_online,
    .cpu_offline        = hotplug_cpu_offline,
    .exit           = hotplug_exit,
    .name           = "hotplug_cbs",
    .timeout_ms     = 1000U,
};

SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct sched_ext_ops hotplug_nocb_ops = {
    .exit           = hotplug_exit,
    .name           = "hotplug_nocbs",
    .timeout_ms     = 1000U,
};

A common appraoch is struct_ops

  • https://lwn.net/Articles/809092/
  • https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1607/attachments/1164/2407/lpc-struct_ops.pdf
  • https://docs.ebpf.io/linux/program-type/BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS/
  • https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/075dbe9f6e3c21596c5245826a4ee1f1c1676eb8/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c#L279

In kernel:

static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_hid_bpf_ops = {
    .verifier_ops = &hid_bpf_verifier_ops,
    .init = hid_bpf_ops_init,
    .check_member = hid_bpf_ops_check_member,
    .init_member = hid_bpf_ops_init_member,
    .reg = hid_bpf_reg,
    .unreg = hid_bpf_unreg,
    .name = "hid_bpf_ops",
    .cfi_stubs = &__bpf_hid_bpf_ops,
    .owner = THIS_MODULE,
};

void __hid_bpf_ops_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hdev)
{
    struct hid_bpf_ops *e;

    rcu_read_lock();
    list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &hdev->bpf.prog_list, list) {
        hid_put_device(hdev);
        e->hdev = NULL;
    }
    rcu_read_unlock();
}

static int __init hid_bpf_struct_ops_init(void)
{
    return register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_hid_bpf_ops, hid_bpf_ops);
}
late_initcall(hid_bpf_struct_ops_init);

2. Event Monitoring and Observability

Definition: Real-time collection and analysis of kernel and user-space events for monitoring, diagnostics, and performance analysis.

Use Cases:

  • System Tracing: probes

  • Example: Utilizing tools like bpftrace or BCC (BPF Compiler Collection) to attach eBPF programs to tracepoints or kprobes, enabling detailed monitoring of system calls, function executions, and performance bottlenecks.

  • System Tracing: tracepoints

  • Performance Profiling:

  • Example: Profiling CPU usage, memory allocations, and I/O operations to identify and resolve performance issues in applications and the kernel.

probes:

SEC("uretprobe//bin/bash:readline")
int BPF_KRETPROBE(printret, const void *ret)
{
 char str[MAX_LINE_SIZE];
 char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
 u32 pid;

 if (!ret)
  return 0;

 bpf_get_current_comm(&comm, sizeof(comm));

 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
 bpf_probe_read_user_str(str, sizeof(str), ret);

 bpf_printk("PID %d (%s) read: %s ", pid, comm, str);

 return 0;
};

tracepoints/USDT

SEC("tracepoint/syscalls/sys_enter_openat")
int tracepoint__syscalls__sys_enter_openat(struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter* ctx)
{
    u64 id = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
    u32 pid = id >> 32;

    if (pid_target && pid_target != pid)
        return false;

    // Use bpf_printk to print the process information
    bpf_printk("Process ID: %d enter sys openat\n", pid);
    return 0;
}

Foe example, the USDT are define as:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys sdt.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
  int nargs = argc;

  getc(stdin);

  nargs = argc;

  DTRACE_PROBE1(example, args, nargs);

        return 0;
}

The tracepoints are define as

#include <trace/events/subsys.h>

#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
DEFINE_TRACE(subsys_eventname);

void somefct(void)
{
        ...
        trace_subsys_eventname(arg, task);
        ...
}

3. High-Speed Data Processing

Definition: Implementing high-performance data processing within the kernel to bypass traditional software paths and enhance data handling efficiency.

Use Cases:

  • XDP (eXpress Data Path):

  • Example: Processing network packets at the earliest point in the network stack using eBPF programs to perform actions like filtering, redirection, or load balancing with minimal latency. For instance, implementing high-performance DDoS protection by quickly discarding malicious traffic to protect backend services.

  • TCP Connection Optimization:

  • Example: Enhancing the processing logic of TCP connections with eBPF to reduce latency and increase throughput. This includes customizing congestion control algorithms to better suit specific network environments, thereby improving network transmission efficiency.

  • Custom Protocol Handling:

  • Example: Implementing custom network protocols or enhancing existing ones directly within the kernel using eBPF, allowing for specialized processing tailored to application needs.

xdp:

SEC("xdp")
int xdp_pass(struct xdp_md* ctx) {
    void* data = (void*)(long)ctx->data;
    void* data_end = (void*)(long)ctx->data_end;
    int pkt_sz = data_end - data;

    bpf_printk("packet size is %d", pkt_sz);
    return XDP_PASS;
}

sockops:

SEC("sk_msg")
int bpf_redir(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
{
    if(msg->remote_ip4 != LOCALHOST_IPV4 || msg->local_ip4!= LOCALHOST_IPV4) 
        return SK_PASS;

    struct sock_key key = {
        .sip = msg->remote_ip4,
        .dip = msg->local_ip4,
        .dport = bpf_htonl(msg->local_port), /* convert to network byte order */
        .sport = msg->remote_port,
        .family = msg->family,
    };
    return bpf_msg_redirect_hash(msg, &sock_ops_map, &key, BPF_F_INGRESS);
}

No possible to use probe. <10 ns make a difference, kprobe is 100ns. No trampoline. less function call.

4. Access Control and Security

Definition: Dynamically enforcing access control policies to enhance system security.

Use Cases:

  • Dynamic Firewall Rules:

  • Example: Using eBPF to dynamically update firewall rules based on real-time threat intelligence, adjusting packet filtering strategies accordingly. For example, automatically blocking related IP addresses or ports when detecting abnormal traffic.

  • LSM (Linux Security Modules) Enhancements:

  • Example: Integrating eBPF with LSM frameworks like SELinux or AppArmor to create fine-grained access control policies that can be dynamically adjusted based on system state or security events.

  • Seccomp Filters:

  • Example: Applying advanced seccomp (secure computing) filters using eBPF to restrict system calls for specific applications, enhancing sandboxing and reducing attack surfaces.

  • Container Security:

  • Example: Implementing security policies for containerized environments, such as Kubernetes, where eBPF enforces network policies, limits resource usage, and isolates container processes.

example:

LSM

kernel code:

        error = security_file_mprotect(vma, reqprot, prot);
        if (error)
            break;

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/075dbe9f6e3c21596c5245826a4ee1f1c1676eb8/mm/mprotect.c#L824

More detail analysis:

  • https://elinux.org/images/0/0a/ELC_Inside_LSM.pdf
  • https://docs.kernel.org/bpf/prog_lsm.html
  • https://blog.cloudflare.com/live-patch-security-vulnerabilities-with-ebpf-lsm/

eBPF code example:

SEC("lsm/file_mprotect")
int BPF_PROG(mprotect_audit, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
             unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, int ret)
{
        /* ret is the return value from the previous BPF program
         * or 0 if it's the first hook.
         */
        if (ret != 0)
                return ret;

        int is_heap;

        is_heap = (vma->vm_start >= vma->vm_mm->start_brk &&
                   vma->vm_end <= vma->vm_mm->brk);

        /* Return an -EPERM or write information to the perf events buffer
         * for auditing
         */
        if (is_heap)
                return -EPERM;
}
  • Return one value to access control one operation.
  • Statically define in the code path.

5. Testing and Error Injection

Definition: Utilizing eBPF for system testing, debugging, and injecting errors to verify system robustness and fault tolerance.

Use Cases:

  • Performance Testing:

  • Example: Monitoring the execution time of specific kernel functions or user-space applications using eBPF-based tools like bpftrace to identify performance bottlenecks.

  • Functionality Verification:

  • Example: Dynamically inserting probes with eBPF to verify that certain system calls or kernel functions behave as expected, ensuring the correctness of new features or patches.

  • Network Fault Simulation:

  • Example: Using eBPF to simulate network issues such as packet loss, increased latency, or bandwidth limitations to test how applications handle adverse network conditions.

  • Memory Error Injection:

  • Example: Simulating memory allocation failures or inducing memory leaks with eBPF to validate the system’s resilience and error-handling mechanisms.

  • I/O Error Simulation:

  • Example: Introducing artificial I/O errors to test the robustness of storage systems and applications in handling disk failures or read/write errors.

  • System Call Failures:

  • Example: Using eBPF to force certain system calls to fail under specific conditions, allowing developers to test application responses to unexpected failures.

6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

Definition: Applying kernel patches or fixes at runtime to address vulnerabilities or optimize functionalities without restarting the system.

Use Cases:

  • Dynamic Vulnerability Patching:

  • Example: Using eBPF to override or modify the behavior of vulnerable kernel functions on-the-fly, preventing exploitation without waiting for official kernel updates.

  • Feature Enhancements:

  • Example: Adding new functionalities to existing kernel components, such as introducing new caching strategies for file systems or optimizing network protocol handling, without modifying the kernel source code.

  • Bug Fixes:

  • Example: Implementing temporary bug fixes in production environments by dynamically patching kernel behavior using eBPF, ensuring system stability while awaiting official patches.

  • Runtime Configuration Changes:

  • Example: Adjusting kernel parameters or behaviors dynamically based on changing workload requirements, enhancing flexibility and responsiveness without downtime.

bpf_override_return：

+SEC("kprobe/open_ctree")
+int bpf_prog1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+   unsigned long rc = -12;
+
+   bpf_override_return(ctx, rc);
+   return 0;
+}
+

Summary

By consolidating Testing and Error Injection into a single category and refining the classification, we achieve a more streamlined and comprehensive understanding of eBPF's diverse applications within the Linux kernel. Here's the final categorized list:

  1. Policy Tuning: Dynamically adjusting kernel policies to optimize system behavior and performance.
  2. Event Monitoring and Observability: Real-time collection and analysis of system events for monitoring, diagnostics, and performance analysis.
  3. High-Speed Data Processing: Implementing efficient data processing within the kernel, bypassing traditional software paths to enhance data handling efficiency.
  4. Access Control and Security: Dynamically enforcing access control policies to enhance system security.
  5. Testing and Error Injection: Utilizing eBPF for system testing, debugging, and injecting errors to verify system robustness and fault tolerance.
  6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates: Applying kernel patches or fixes at runtime to address vulnerabilities or optimize functionalities without restarting the system.

Each category encompasses a wide range of functionalities, from optimizing system performance and enhancing security to enabling advanced testing and dynamic system modifications—all achieved without altering the kernel source code or requiring system reboots. This classification not only aligns with your requirements but also provides a clear framework for understanding and leveraging eBPF to achieve flexible and dynamic kernel enhancements.

userspace

1. Policy Tuning

Definition: Dynamically adjusting application policies to optimize performance, resource usage, or behavior based on real-time conditions.

Use Cases:

  • Dynamic Resource Allocation:
  • Example: A userspace application, such as a web server, can dynamically adjust its thread pool size or cache sizes based on current traffic loads. For instance, during peak traffic, the application can increase the number of worker threads to handle more requests, and scale back during low traffic periods to conserve resources.

  • Analysis: This allows applications to maintain optimal performance without manual intervention, adapting to varying workloads seamlessly.

  • Adaptive Rate Limiting:

  • Example: Implementing dynamic rate limiting for APIs based on real-time usage patterns. If an endpoint experiences a sudden spike in requests, the application can automatically tighten rate limits to prevent overloading while loosening them during normal traffic.

  • Analysis: Enhances the application's ability to handle fluctuating demand while protecting against abuse and ensuring fair resource distribution.

  • Energy Efficiency Adjustments:

  • Example: On battery-powered devices, applications can adjust their operational parameters (e.g., reducing polling frequency or lowering graphical fidelity) based on battery levels to extend device usage time.
  • Analysis: Improves user experience by balancing performance with energy consumption dynamically.

2. Event Monitoring and Observability

Definition: Real-time collection, analysis, and visualization of application and system events for monitoring, diagnostics, and performance analysis.

Use Cases:

  • Real-Time Logging and Metrics Collection:
  • Example: Applications can dynamically inject custom logging or metrics collection points based on runtime conditions. For example, a database application might increase logging verbosity during peak usage times to diagnose performance issues.

  • Analysis: Provides granular insights into application behavior and performance, facilitating proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.

  • Dynamic Tracing and Profiling:

  • Example: Using a userspace extension to attach tracing hooks to specific functions or modules within an application to monitor execution paths and performance bottlenecks without restarting the application.

  • Analysis: Enhances the ability to perform in-depth performance analysis and debugging in production environments with minimal overhead.

  • Anomaly Detection:

  • Example: Implementing real-time anomaly detection within applications to identify unusual patterns or behaviors, such as unexpected spikes in resource usage or error rates, and trigger alerts or corrective actions.
  • Analysis: Improves application reliability and uptime by enabling swift detection and response to abnormal conditions.

3. High-Speed Data Processing

Definition: Implementing efficient data processing mechanisms within applications to handle large volumes of data with minimal latency.

Use Cases:

  • In-Memory Data Processing Enhancements:
  • Example: Applications like real-time analytics platforms can dynamically optimize in-memory data structures or processing algorithms based on incoming data patterns to improve throughput and reduce latency.

  • Analysis: Enables applications to maintain high performance and responsiveness under varying data loads by adapting processing strategies on-the-fly.

  • Custom Data Filtering and Transformation:

  • Example: A streaming data application can apply dynamic filters or transformations to incoming data streams based on current processing needs or external inputs, such as prioritizing certain data types during specific times.

  • Analysis: Increases the flexibility and efficiency of data processing pipelines, allowing applications to respond to changing data requirements without redeployment.

  • Optimized Network Data Handling:

  • Example: Network-intensive applications, such as video conferencing tools, can dynamically adjust data encoding or compression techniques based on network conditions to optimize bandwidth usage and maintain video quality.
  • Analysis: Enhances user experience by ensuring efficient data transmission and adapting to fluctuating network environments in real-time.

4. Access Control and Security

Definition: Dynamically enforcing access control policies and security measures to protect applications and data.

Use Cases:

  • Dynamic Permission Management:
  • Example: Applications can adjust user permissions in real-time based on contextual factors such as user behavior, location, or device security status. For instance, granting elevated privileges only when certain security checks pass.

  • Analysis: Enhances security by ensuring that access rights are contextually appropriate, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

  • Runtime Threat Mitigation:

  • Example: Integrating a userspace security module that monitors application behavior and dynamically blocks suspicious activities, such as unusual file access patterns or unexpected network connections.

  • Analysis: Provides proactive defense mechanisms that can adapt to emerging threats without requiring application restarts or updates.

  • Secure API Gateways:

  • Example: Implementing dynamic security policies in API gateways to filter and validate incoming requests based on real-time threat intelligence, such as blocking requests from malicious IPs or enforcing stricter validation rules under attack conditions.
  • Analysis: Enhances the security posture of applications by enabling real-time adjustments to security policies in response to the threat landscape.

5. Testing and Error Injection

Definition: Utilizing dynamic capabilities to perform system testing, debugging, and injecting errors to verify system robustness and fault tolerance.

Use Cases:

  • Fault Injection for Resilience Testing:
  • Example: Introducing simulated failures, such as network outages, memory leaks, or disk I/O errors within applications to test how they handle and recover from unexpected conditions.

  • Analysis: Helps developers identify weaknesses and improve the resilience of applications by observing their behavior under controlled failure scenarios.

  • Dynamic Behavior Simulation:

  • Example: Simulating different user behaviors or load conditions dynamically to test application performance and scalability without needing predefined test scripts.

  • Analysis: Provides a more realistic and flexible approach to testing by allowing applications to experience varied and unpredictable scenarios during testing phases.

  • Performance Benchmarking:

  • Example: Attaching dynamic profiling tools to applications to measure performance metrics such as execution time, memory usage, and I/O operations under different runtime conditions.

  • Analysis: Facilitates comprehensive performance assessments, enabling targeted optimizations based on real-time data.

  • Dynamic Debugging:

  • Example: Inserting debugging hooks into applications at runtime to monitor and log internal states or variable values without stopping the application, aiding in real-time troubleshooting.
  • Analysis: Enhances the debugging process by allowing developers to gain insights into application behavior without disrupting its operation.

6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

Definition: Applying patches, updates, or fixes to applications at runtime to address vulnerabilities, optimize functionalities, or introduce new features without restarting the system.

Use Cases:

  • Hotfix Deployment:
  • Example: Rolling out critical security patches or bug fixes to running applications without downtime, ensuring continuous operation while maintaining security and stability.

  • Analysis: Minimizes service disruptions and enhances the ability to respond swiftly to critical issues, maintaining high availability.

  • Feature Flag Management:

  • Example: Enabling or disabling application features dynamically based on user feedback, A/B testing results, or deployment strategies without redeploying the application.

  • Analysis: Increases flexibility in feature management, allowing for controlled rollouts and quick iterations based on real-world usage and feedback.

  • Runtime Code Injection:

  • Example: Injecting new code or modifying existing code paths within applications to introduce performance optimizations or new functionalities on-the-fly.

  • Analysis: Enhances the ability to evolve application capabilities dynamically, adapting to changing requirements without extensive downtime or redevelopment efforts.

  • Dynamic Configuration Updates:

  • Example: Adjusting application configurations such as thresholds, timeouts, or resource limits in real-time based on operational metrics and conditions.
  • Analysis: Improves application adaptability by allowing configurations to be fine-tuned in response to real-time operational data, enhancing performance and reliability.

Summary

By extending the dynamic capabilities analogous to kernel eBPF into userspace, applications can achieve greater flexibility, efficiency, and resilience. The six high-level categories—Policy Tuning, Event Monitoring and Observability, High-Speed Data Processing, Access Control and Security, Testing and Error Injection, and Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates—encompass a wide range of functionalities that empower applications to adapt and optimize in real-time. Below is a consolidated list of these categories with their respective userspace use cases:

  1. Policy Tuning
  2. Dynamic CPU Scheduling
  3. Memory Management Optimization
  4. Dynamic I/O Scheduling

  5. Network QoS Adjustments

  6. Event Monitoring and Observability

  7. System Tracing
  8. Performance Profiling
  9. Network Traffic Analysis

  10. Application Metrics Collection

  11. High-Speed Data Processing

  12. XDP (eXpress Data Path)
  13. TCP Connection Optimization

  14. Custom Protocol Handling

  15. Access Control and Security

  16. Dynamic Firewall Rules
  17. LSM Enhancements
  18. Seccomp Filters

  19. Container Security

  20. Testing and Error Injection

  21. Fault Injection for Resilience Testing
  22. Dynamic Behavior Simulation
  23. Performance Benchmarking

  24. Dynamic Debugging

  25. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

  26. Hotfix Deployment
  27. Feature Flag Management
  28. Runtime Code Injection
  29. Dynamic Configuration Updates

These categories not only align with the kernel eBPF use cases but also expand into areas specifically relevant to userspace applications. By leveraging a userspace extension framework with these capabilities, developers can create more adaptable, secure, and high-performing applications that can respond dynamically to changing conditions and requirements.

Core Requirements

1. Policy Tuning

Definition: Dynamically adjusting application or system policies to optimize performance, resource usage, or behavior based on real-time conditions.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (9): Ensure that dynamic policy adjustments enhance or maintain system/application performance without introducing overhead.
  • Security (6): While not the primary focus, policies should not compromise security; important but secondary to performance.
  • Expressiveness (8): Ability to define complex and programmable policies that cater to diverse scenarios.
  • Flexibility (8): Adapt policies seamlessly to varying conditions and requirements in real-time.
  • Control (7): Enable dynamic adjustments of policies via control mechanisms, such as updating parameters based on monitoring data.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • Dynamic CPU Scheduling: Utilizing eBPF to adjust the scheduler’s behavior based on real-time CPU load, prioritizing critical processes to ensure responsive performance under high load.

  • Userspace:

  • Dynamic Resource Allocation: A web server dynamically adjusts its thread pool size based on current traffic, scaling resources up or down to optimize performance and resource utilization.

2. Event Monitoring and Observability

Definition: Real-time collection and analysis of kernel and user-space events for monitoring, diagnostics, and performance analysis.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (7): Minimize the overhead introduced by monitoring to prevent performance degradation.
  • Security (8): Protect sensitive data during monitoring and ensure integrity of collected data.
  • Expressiveness (8): Capture a wide range of events and conditions with the ability to define custom metrics.
  • Flexibility (7): Customize monitoring to focus on relevant events and adjust as needed.
  • Control (7): Allow dynamic adjustments of monitoring parameters via control interfaces.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • System Tracing: Using tools like bpftrace to attach eBPF programs to tracepoints, enabling detailed monitoring of system calls and kernel functions.

  • Userspace:

  • Real-Time Metrics Collection: An application increases logging verbosity during peak times to diagnose performance issues without restarting or redeploying.

3. High-Speed Data Processing

Definition: Implementing high-performance data processing within applications to handle large volumes of data with minimal latency.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (9): Critical to process data efficiently with minimal latency.
  • Security (5): Ensure that data processing does not introduce vulnerabilities; maintain data integrity.
  • Expressiveness (7): Ability to implement diverse and complex data processing logic.
  • Flexibility (8): Adapt processing strategies dynamically based on data patterns or workload.
  • Control (7): Adjust processing parameters and logic dynamically through control mechanisms.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • XDP (eXpress Data Path): Processing network packets at the earliest point to perform actions like filtering or load balancing with minimal latency.

  • Userspace:

  • In-Memory Data Optimization: A real-time analytics platform adjusts data structures based on incoming data patterns to improve throughput.

4. Access Control and Security

Definition: Dynamically enforcing access control policies and security measures to protect applications and data.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (7): Implement security measures without causing significant performance overhead.
  • Security (9): Primary focus on protecting against unauthorized access and threats.
  • Expressiveness (7): Define detailed and nuanced access control policies.
  • Flexibility (8): Adapt security policies in response to evolving threats and operational conditions.
  • Control (7): Manage and adjust security policies dynamically via control interfaces.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • LSM Enhancements: Using eBPF to dynamically update firewall rules based on real-time threat intelligence.

  • Userspace:

  • Dynamic Permission Management: Applications adjust user permissions in real-time based on contextual factors like user behavior or device security status.

5. Testing and Error Injection

Definition: Utilizing dynamic capabilities to perform system testing, debugging, and injecting errors to verify robustness and fault tolerance.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (8): Conduct testing and error injections without significantly impacting performance.
  • Security (7): Ensure testing processes do not expose vulnerabilities or compromise security.
  • Expressiveness (7): Simulate a wide range of test scenarios and error conditions.
  • Flexibility (8): Adapt tests to various conditions and requirements dynamically.
  • Control (8): Precisely manage testing parameters and error injection points via control mechanisms.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • Fault Injection: Using eBPF to simulate conditions like memory allocation failures to test kernel and application resilience.

  • Userspace:

  • Resilience Testing: Injecting simulated network outages within an application to verify its ability to recover and maintain stability.

6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

Definition: Applying patches, updates, or fixes to applications at runtime to address vulnerabilities or optimize functionalities without restarting the system.

Core Requirements:

  • Performance (8): Apply patches without introducing performance penalties during or after the update.
  • Security (9): Ensure patches securely fix vulnerabilities without creating new ones.
  • Expressiveness (7): Support a wide range of patches and updates, including complex changes.
  • Flexibility (8): Adapt the patching process to different types of updates and system states.
  • Control (9): Provide robust mechanisms to manage patch application dynamically.

Examples:

  • Kernel:

  • Dynamic Vulnerability Patching: Using eBPF to modify the behavior of vulnerable kernel functions on-the-fly.

  • Userspace:

  • Hotfix Deployment: Applying critical security patches to a running application without downtime, maintaining continuous operation.

Summary of Core Requirements Importance

Category Performance Security Expressiveness Flexibility Control
1. Policy Tuning 9 6 8 8 7
2. Event Monitoring and Observability 7 8 8 7 7
3. High-Speed Data Processing 9 5 7 8 7
4. Access Control and Security 7 9 7 8 7
5. Testing and Error Injection 8 7 7 8 8
6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates 8 9 7 8 9

Key Insights

  1. Performance is crucial in Policy Tuning and High-Speed Data Processing, where efficiency and low overhead are essential.
  2. Security is paramount in Access Control and Security and Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates, focusing on protecting against threats and vulnerabilities.
  3. Expressiveness allows for defining complex policies and logic, important across all categories for tailored solutions.
  4. Flexibility is consistently important, enabling dynamic adaptation to changing conditions and requirements.
  5. Control mechanisms are vital for managing and adjusting behaviors, policies, and updates dynamically across all categories.

Conclusion

This refined overview focuses on the five core requirements of Performance, Security, Expressiveness, Flexibility, and Control across the six categories of eBPF use cases:

  1. Policy Tuning
  2. Event Monitoring and Observability
  3. High-Speed Data Processing
  4. Access Control and Security
  5. Testing and Error Injection
  6. Patch Fixing and Dynamic Updates

By concentrating on these key aspects, developers and system administrators can prioritize and implement eBPF-based solutions that enhance application and system performance, security, and adaptability. This approach ensures that dynamic adjustments, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration with control mechanisms are effectively addressed in various use cases, leading to robust and efficient systems.

Share on Share on