Skip to content

Fine-Grained GPU Code Modifications

In GPU programming, certain optimizations can only be achieved through direct modifications to the kernel code itself, rather than through API-level interception or external profiling. This document explores various fine-grained GPU customization techniques that require direct modifications to CUDA kernels.

When to Use Fine-Grained Modifications

While external profiling tools can help identify bottlenecks, certain optimizations require modifying the kernel code directly:

  1. Memory access pattern optimizations: Restructuring data layouts and access patterns
  2. Thread/warp-level primitives: Utilizing low-level CUDA features like warp shuffles and voting
  3. Custom synchronization mechanisms: Implementing fine-grained control over thread execution
  4. Algorithm-specific optimizations: Tailoring execution to data characteristics
  5. Memory hierarchy utilization: Custom management of shared memory, registers, and caches

Key Fine-Grained Optimization Techniques

1. Data Structure Layout Optimization (AoS vs SoA)

The memory layout of data structures significantly impacts performance due to how GPUs access memory.

Array of Structures (AoS) vs Structure of Arrays (SoA)

// Array of Structures (AoS) - Less efficient on GPUs
struct Particle_AoS {
    float x, y, z;    // Position
    float vx, vy, vz; // Velocity
};

// Structure of Arrays (SoA) - More efficient on GPUs
struct Particles_SoA {
    float *x, *y, *z;    // Positions
    float *vx, *vy, *vz; // Velocities
};

Why SoA is often better: - Enables coalesced memory access patterns - Threads within a warp access adjacent memory locations - Better utilizes memory bandwidth - Improves cache hit rates

Performance Impact: - Can provide 2-5x speedup for memory-bound kernels - Especially beneficial for large data structures with partial access patterns

2. Warp-Level Primitives and Synchronization

Modern CUDA GPUs provide warp-level primitives that allow threads within a warp to communicate directly.

Example: Optimized Histogram Calculation

Histograms traditionally suffer from atomic operation contention. Using warp-level primitives can significantly improve performance:

// Optimized histogram using warp-level primitives
__global__ void histogram_optimized(unsigned char* data, unsigned int* histogram, int size) {
    // Shared memory for per-block histograms
    __shared__ unsigned int localHist[HISTOGRAM_SIZE];

    // Initialize shared memory
    int tid = threadIdx.x;
    if (tid < HISTOGRAM_SIZE) {
        localHist[tid] = 0;
    }
    __syncthreads();

    // Process data with less atomic contention using shared memory
    int idx = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    int stride = blockDim.x * gridDim.x;

    while (idx < size) {
        unsigned char value = data[idx];
        atomicAdd(&localHist[value], 1);
        idx += stride;
    }
    __syncthreads();

    // Cooperative reduction to global memory
    // Each warp handles a portion of the histogram
    int warpSize = 32;
    int warpId = threadIdx.x / warpSize;
    int laneId = threadIdx.x % warpSize;
    int numWarps = (blockDim.x + warpSize - 1) / warpSize;

    int binsPerWarp = (HISTOGRAM_SIZE + numWarps - 1) / numWarps;
    int warpStart = warpId * binsPerWarp;
    int warpEnd = min(warpStart + binsPerWarp, HISTOGRAM_SIZE);

    for (int binIdx = warpStart + laneId; binIdx < warpEnd; binIdx += warpSize) {
        if (binIdx < HISTOGRAM_SIZE) {
            atomicAdd(&histogram[binIdx], localHist[binIdx]);
        }
    }
}

Benefits: - Reduced atomic contention - Better workload distribution - Improved memory access patterns - Significant performance improvement for scatter operations

3. Memory Access Pattern Optimization with Tiling

Memory access patterns are critical for GPU performance. Tiling is a technique that restructures data access to better utilize caches and memory bandwidth.

Example: Matrix Transpose with Tiling

__global__ void transposeTiled(float* input, float* output, int width, int height) {
    __shared__ float tile[TILE_DIM][TILE_DIM+1]; // +1 to avoid bank conflicts

    int x = blockIdx.x * TILE_DIM + threadIdx.x;
    int y = blockIdx.y * TILE_DIM + threadIdx.y;

    // Load tile collaboratively with coalesced reads
    if (x < width && y < height) {
        tile[threadIdx.y][threadIdx.x] = input[y * width + x];
    }
    __syncthreads();

    // Calculate transposed coordinates
    int out_x = blockIdx.y * TILE_DIM + threadIdx.x;
    int out_y = blockIdx.x * TILE_DIM + threadIdx.y;

    // Write tile with coalesced writes
    if (out_x < height && out_y < width) {
        output[out_y * height + out_x] = tile[threadIdx.x][threadIdx.y];
    }
}

Key aspects: - Uses shared memory as a collaborative cache - Avoids bank conflicts with padding (+1 in the tile dimension) - Ensures coalesced memory access for both reads and writes - Dramatically improves performance for matrix operations

4. Kernel Fusion for Performance

Kernel fusion combines multiple operations into a single kernel to reduce memory traffic and kernel launch overhead.

Example: Fused Vector Operations

// Separate kernels
__global__ void vectorAdd(float* a, float* b, float* c, int n) {
    int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    if (i < n) {
        c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
    }
}

__global__ void vectorScale(float* c, float* d, float scale, int n) {
    int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    if (i < n) {
        d[i] = c[i] * scale;
    }
}

// Fused kernel
__global__ void vectorAddAndScale(float* a, float* b, float* d, float scale, int n) {
    int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    if (i < n) {
        // Fuse the operations to avoid extra global memory traffic
        d[i] = (a[i] + b[i]) * scale;
    }
}

Benefits: - Reduced global memory traffic - Eliminated intermediate data storage - Fewer kernel launches and associated overhead - Improved data locality and cache utilization

5. Dynamic Execution Path Selection

GPU kernels can dynamically adapt their execution based on data characteristics, allowing for optimized performance across different scenarios.

Example: Sparse vs Dense Data Processing

__global__ void processAdaptive(float* input, float* output, int size, float density) {
    int idx = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    if (idx < size) {
        float val = input[idx];

        // Dynamic branch based on data characteristics
        if (density < 0.5f) {
            // Sparse data path
            if (val != 0.0f) {
                // Perform expensive computation only on non-zero elements
                for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
                    val = sinf(val) * cosf(val);
                }
                output[idx] = val;
            } else {
                output[idx] = 0.0f;
            }
        } else {
            // Dense data path
            for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
                val = sinf(val) * cosf(val);
            }
            output[idx] = val;
        }
    }
}

Key aspects: - Runtime decision making based on data properties - Different execution paths for different data characteristics - Adaptation to workload patterns - Can reduce unnecessary computation for certain data types

Implementation Considerations

When implementing fine-grained GPU optimizations:

  1. Measure the impact: Always benchmark before and after optimizations
  2. Consider maintainability: Complex optimizations may reduce code readability
  3. Evaluate portability: Some optimizations are architecture-specific
  4. Balance between optimization techniques: Sometimes combining techniques yields the best results
  5. Consider compute vs. memory bounds: Apply the right optimizations for your bottleneck
  6. Test across different data sizes: Optimization benefits can vary with problem size

Advanced Topics

Thread Divergence Management

Thread divergence occurs when threads within a warp take different execution paths, causing serialization:

// Poor code with divergence
if (threadIdx.x % 2 == 0) {
    // Path A - executed by even threads
} else {
    // Path B - executed by odd threads
}

// Better organization to minimize divergence
if (blockIdx.x % 2 == 0) {
    // All threads in this block take this path
} else {
    // All threads in this block take this path
}

Tuning for Different GPU Architectures

Different GPU architectures have varying characteristics:

#if __CUDA_ARCH__ >= 700
    // Volta/Turing/Ampere specific optimizations
    __syncwarp(); // Synchronize active threads in warp
#else
    // Pre-Volta fallback
    __syncthreads(); // Full block synchronization as fallback
#endif

Custom Memory Management Techniques

Advanced memory management for better performance:

  1. Register usage optimization: Adjust kernel complexity based on register pressure
  2. Shared memory bank conflict avoidance: Use padding or data layout changes
  3. L1/L2 cache utilization: Control data access patterns to maximize cache hits
  4. Texture memory for irregular access: Use texture cache for random access patterns

Conclusion

Fine-grained GPU code modifications are essential for achieving maximum performance in GPU applications. By understanding and applying these techniques, developers can significantly improve the execution efficiency of their CUDA kernels.

The examples provided in this document demonstrate practical implementation of these concepts, but the real power comes from combining multiple techniques and adapting them to specific application requirements.

References

  1. NVIDIA CUDA Programming Guide: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/
  2. NVIDIA CUDA Best Practices Guide: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-best-practices-guide/
  3. Volkov, V. (2010). "Better performance at lower occupancy." GPU Technology Conference.
  4. Harris, M. "GPU Performance Analysis and Optimization." NVIDIA Developer Blog.
  5. Jia, Z., et al. (2019). "Dissecting the NVIDIA Volta GPU Architecture via Microbenchmarking." arXiv:1804.06826.

Share on Share on